data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd66f/fd66fee600a697bb98b15b31db04327c87f6b470" alt=""
Is The Gallery at Market East really that bad? Let's put aside what architecture was lost to build the mall and take a look at what we are left with. It's not an eyesore, or doesn't have to be. Sure, it's not great architecture, but most malls aren't. Regardless of their brutal and cold exterior, many malls - even ones located in urban cores - continue to thrive.
The American Mall is a case study in Marketing 101. No matter where they are or what they look like they make you want to come inside and spend money. And aside from The Gallery, they make this marketability look so easy. How is it that while other malls - clad in the same windowless concrete - look so inviting, while The Gallery looks more like a Soviet fortress than the symbol of capitalism it should be?
Inside and out The Gallery is clean and practical. Aesthetically it is in need of a very simple makeover. Lighting fixtures and a new font would go a long way toward not only attracting clientele, but also attracting businesses that recognize an organization eager to create a new image. Take a look at Washington's urban mall, Mazza Gallerie. Architecturally, short of a face lift, isn't much different than The Gallery at Market East.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c4df/4c4dfa64099ef3e7d186c31310795a9c4ab0002a" alt=""
The Gallery has no excuse for a lack of appeal. The only excuse it can possibly offer is mismanagement caused by laziness.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3517/a35173bd6e3b73863d120ddb89e178a2dc005768" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment